On the Failures of "Education Reform"
Exploring failed education policy through a series of Twitter threads
Education historian Jack Schneider explored the popular education reforms of the past two decades in an attempt to explain why what passes for education reform has essentially failed to achieve the desired results.
Essentially, these reforms can be placed into three categories, per Schneider.
Test-based accountability
Teacher merit pay
Competition/choice - by way of charters/vouchers
Schneider suggests that these reforms are not working because they are based on a flawed premise.
That premise? Educators will respond when policymakers “turn up the heat.”
At the heart of this premise is the idea that educators are somehow “holding back” and only need the proper motivation to really “stand and deliver.”
Of course, now we have decades of data showing this simply isn’t getting results.
Schneider’s thread helps explain, too, why surveys of teachers repeatedly show that increasing pay alone is not enough - that is, sure, teachers deserve better compensation - but what they really want is to be trusted to do their jobs and to receive the necessary resources to do that job well.
More testing, merit pay, and competition for students are three education reform solutions that do nothing to solve the challenges teachers face in their day-to-day work. As a result, they do nothing to actually get the results that reformers claim to want.
In fact, all three of these policy “solutions” actually serve to exacerbate the very real challenges educators face.
Here’s the full thread:
While these flaws have been and are being exposed, some state policymakers are doubling down on really bad ideas.
Justin Parmenter has been closely examining North Carolina’s potential move to teacher merit pay.
Here’s a thread from him on the latest as that state, once a proud leader in positive education policy, now seems ready to go all in on reforms that are destined to fail (and, in fact, have failed elsewhere):
Finally, in Tennessee, the state’s new charter school commission seems likely to ultimately expand charter schools across the state. While a recent fight over Hillsdale College’s attempt to open three schools in the state may have delayed the expansion of charter schools in the Volunteer State, the unelected commission and pro-privatization Gov. Bill Lee have tremendous power to bring about more failed reform in coming years.
Here’s more on a new effort to explain the true cost of charter school adoption on local school districts. The group Public School Partners has launched a website - CharterFiscalImpact.org - that features a calculator that shows the fixed costs associated with opening a charter school.
Great article. Note that all of the failed reforms, and others not discussed, share one fundamental problem. They are all top-down reforms. We could include Common Core curriculum reform (also associated with testing) requiring schools to may Adequate Yearly Progress or face consequences (No Child Left Behind), Teach for America, the Gates Foundation Small High Schools project.
Meanwhile successful grass roots innovations are ignored. Community schools, wrap around services, working to improve attendance by finding out why students are afraid of school.... There are ways to improve instruction. We need to fund ideas that work and spread them around, just like the coaches do.